Eolas jury holds embedded hypertext patent invalid

Eolas, a company which many describe as a “patent troll”, has suffered a serious set-back in litigation against, Google, Amazon and others.  As has been widely reported, a Texas jury found that the patent was invalid for want of novelty.  So, what was the patent?  According to the specification:

A system allowing a user of a browser program on a computer connected to an open distributed hypermedia system to access and execute an embedded program object. The program object is embedded into a hypermedia document much like data objects.

Relevantly, claim 1 claimed:

A method for running an application program in a computer network environment, comprising:

  1. providing at least one client workstation and one network server …
  2. a browser application … to display, on said client workstation, at least a portion of a first hypermedia document received over said network from said server … and wherein said embed text format is parsed by said browser to automatically … display [it] and enable interactive processing …

In other words, the plaintiff claimed something akin to the tag, utilised in a web browser.  After expert evidence from Tim Berners-Lee and Dave Ragett, the jury found that the claimed invention was not new as at 17 October 1994.

Tough luck for those who already settled with Eolas, which include Apple, Citigroup, eBay, and JP Morgan Chase among their number.  Restitutionary claim, anyone?