Since the recent judgment in Grokster, there has been a flurry of activity analysing whether the Court impliedly altered or repealed the Sony v Betamax standard of secondary liability under US copyright law. On an initial read through, it looks as if Grokster offers little substantive clarification of the liability standard. The Court framed its ruling around an intent-based test, holding software developers liable both for encouraging end users to infringe copyright and for the overall “object” of their activity.
Written by
Jaani Riordan
Search
Recent posts
Topics
- About (1)
- Art (100)
- Civil Law (9)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Commerce (6)
- Contract (2)
- Cooking (2)
- Copyright (43)
- Crime and Security (37)
- Defamation (7)
- Digital Rights Management (4)
- Domain Names (2)
- Earth (7)
- Electronic Communications (15)
- Entertainment (16)
- File Sharing (18)
- Film (4)
- Flash Games (30)
- Free Speech (25)
- Information (10)
- Intellectual Property (23)
- Intermediaries (23)
- Judicial Quotations (34)
- Judiciary (6)
- Law Notes (3)
- Legislation (4)
- Linklog (200)
- Litigation (26)
- Multimedia (1)
- Open Source (4)
- Opera (2)
- Patents (18)
- Politics (7)
- Polls (7)
- Privacy (12)
- Private International Law (3)
- Products (85)
- Projects (1)
- Regulation and Government (23)
- Reviews (6)
- Science (8)
- Site (2)
- Site News (7)
- Technology (25)
- Trademarks (7)
- Travel (1)
- University (14)
- Visual Diary (642)
- Weblog (309)
- Words (10)